Project approach

The project was implemented through a series of iterative steps involving the participation of over 40 individuals representing some 17 CCF member organisations.  We:

  • Agreed common definitions of conservation and conservation success, and that
  • Agreed that a key to assessing conservation success is in finding ways to move measurement beyond activities and outputs to outcomes and impacts
  • Agreed that approaches to evaluating impacts would differ between different types of conservation action; agreed definitions of, and developed working groups addressing, each of seven broad categories of conservation activity
  • Discussed approaches and common issues & challenges in monitoring and evaluating the results of each type of conservation action
  • Developed and harmonised conceptual models of the relationship between each type of conservation activity and conservation impact
  • Developed a scorecard-style evaluation tool based on the models
  • Tested and refined the tool through trial evaluation of more than 25 conservation projects, both by project personnel and in group contexts that tested consistency among users in interpreting the questions
  • Developed a draft scoring system to enable semi-quantitative analysis of evaluated projects
  • Developed research questions and plan of analysis based on the harmonised tools developed.

 

» See also  -  Objectives | Approach | Outputs | Next Steps | Participation | Contact

 

Definitions and Concepts

Conservation is increasing the likelihood of persistence of native ecosystems, habitats, species and/or populations in the wild
Conservation success is the achievement of this (without adverse impacts on human well-being)

Performance can be monitored at several levels

  • Input - have you spent the money?
  • Activity - what did you do with it?
  • Output - what did it get you? How good was it?
  • Outcome - what effect has it had on the problem (cf. what would have happened without it?)
  • Impact - what is happening to the ecosystems/habitats/species/populations (biological change)
  • It is common to monitor and report on inputs, activities and outputs, but assessing conservation success depends on evaluating outcomes and impacts.

Seven catgories of conservation action

CCF members agreed that nearly all of their activities fit comfortably into one or more of the following broad categories of conservation activity.  Most conservation projects involve several, but not all, of these activity types

    • Management of Sites, Habitats, Landscapes and Ecosystems – actions directly manipulating or managing a particular site
    • Management of species and populations – actions directly involving species themselves, such as clutch management, captive breeding, etc.
    • Efforts to develop, adopt or implement policy or legislation - actions to establish frameworks within the processes of government, civil society or the private sector that make conservation goals official or facilitate their accomplishment; may include development, implementation and/or enforcement of legislation, management plans, sectoral policies, trade regulations, among others.
    • Efforts to Enhance and/or Provide Alternative Livelihoods - actions to improve the well-being of people having impact on the species/habitats of conservation interest, including through sustainable resource management, income-generating activities, conservation enterprise, direct incentives.
    • Training and capacity building - actions to enhance specific skills among those directly involved in conservation, includes both building individual skills and improving the many components of organisational capacity.
    • Education and awareness-raising - actions directed at improving understanding and influencing behaviour among people not necessarily directly involved in conservation action. Covers all forms of communication, including campaigns, lobbying, educational and publicity/awareness programmes, and production of materials.
    • Research and conservation planning - actions aimed at improving the information base on which conservation decisions are made, including survey, inventory, remote sensing, mapping, development of new technologies

    Common issues and challenges in assessing conservation sucess

    Participants in the thematic working groups of this project discussed the approaches used by their organisations in monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of each particular type of conservation action.  Several issues were common to all seven working groups:

      • Conservation projects or activities within them frequent lack clearly stated objectives
      • The assumptions about how a particular action will lead to conservation impact are rarely explicitly stated
      • Project rationales (problem analyses) are often coloured by donor priorities, so:
        • Conservation-related objectives may not be not explicit in the project design (e.g. human development objectives may predominate)
        • Monitoring and evaluation address donor priorities and explicit objectives, rather than conservation objectives
        • Addressing the conservation objectives therefore increases monitoring burden, and stretches the resources available
      • Conservation impact time frames are much longer than normal project cycles. Therefore,
        • Projects rarely really assess conservation impacts
        • Support for post-project assessment is needed

      Conceptual models

      The working groups developed simple flow chart models to represent the generic processes by which different types of conservation activity can lead to conservation impact.  Each model begins with problem identification and design of interventions and works through activities and a series of intermediate outcomes to conservation impact.  While engagement with stakeholders is principally depicted at the early stages of each process, it should be understood to be fundamental throughout.  The iterative feedback loops characteristic of adaptive management are also part of the process, but have not been drawn in order to maintain visual clarity.  Key points of input from other types of conservation activity are shown by hexagons and grey arrows, but these are indicative rather than exhaustive. Download the latest Conservation Activity Conceptual Models Word document.

       

 
© Cambridge Conservation Forum 2005, 2006, 2007

This website is maintained by Francis Rowland, Dept of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge